This worksheet was created as a guide for academic institutions and departments to aid in…
DORA-compliant measures of research quality and impact to assess the performance of researchers in biomedical institutions: Review of published research, international best practice and Delphi survey
This paper reviewed existing literature and international best practices and established consensus by Delphi survey…
Exploring researchers’ views on metrics and research impact: Internal report
This internal report for the University of Waikato investigates researchers’ perspectives on metrics and their…
Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality
This paper examines how to appropriately recognize and reward quality research. It critiques the overreliance…
Reformscape Guide
A one page tool that describes the six ways that entries are characterized in the Reformscape dataset. 1. Institution type. 2. Scope. 3. Populations. 4. Career decision. 5. Type of assessment reform. 6. Stages of reform. Part of “Rethinking research assessment” series.
Improving pre-award processes for equitable and transparent research assessment
This is a short report summarizing the key takeaways from a workshop co-organized by the…
Open access research outputs receive more diverse citations
This paper explores the relationship between open access (OA) publishing and citation diversity, offering insights…
Report to the U.S. Congress on Financing Mechanisms for Open Access Publishing of Federally Funded Research
This report from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) discusses financing…
Code of conduct for expert review panel members
Reviewers play a critical role in upholding research integrity within the expert review and funding…
BEYOND LIMITS: New Ways to Reinvent Higher Education
This document from UNESCO is a roadmap for higher education, prepared for the “3rd World…