Reviewers play a critical role in upholding research integrity within the expert review and funding process at the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS). The expert review encompasses a diverse group ranging from researchers, clinicians, patients, survivors, caregivers, decision-makers, and knowledge users, collectively offering a multifaceted evaluation of research grant applications. In alignment with DORA, CCS advocates for a comprehensive assessment framework that does not rely on traditional metrics like journal impact factors or H-index. Instead, CCS review guidelines emphasize broader impact measures such as policy influence, real-world impacts, new knowledge, and open sharing of data and software.
The Code of Conduct for expert review panel members clarifies guidelines for the following:
- Review responsibly
- Declare and avoid conflicts of interest
- Reflect on your privileges and biases to provide a thoughtful and informed review
- Listen and be respectful before and during the panel meeting
- Honor confidentiality in the review process
Canadian Cancer Society (2023). Code of conduct for expert review panel members. https://cancer.ca/en/research/for-researchers/managing-your-grant/code-of-conduct