The 2018 European University Association (EUA) roadmap was approved by the EUA Council at its…
Professional societies
Linguistic Society of America: Statement on the Scholarly Merit and Evaluation of Open Scholarship in Linguistics
The Linguistic Society of America (LSA) published a statement on their commitment to Open Scholarship…
Linguistic Society of America: Statement on Evaluation of Language Documentation for Hiring, Tenure, and Promotion
The Linguistic Society of America (LSA) published a statement of recommendations concerning the appropriate means…
Halt the H-index
The Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) studies bibliometric and scientometric tools to support…
Rethinking success, integrity and culture in research (part 2) A multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science
The authors, Noémie Aubert Bonn and Wim Pinxten, conducted interviews and focus groups with a…
Rethinking success, integrity and culture in research (part 1) A multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science
The authors, Noémie Aubert Bonn and Wim Pinxten, conducted interviews and focus groups with a…
Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers’ opinions on success indicators
A survey was conducted by Noémie Aubert Bonn and Wim Pinxten to understand how Flemish…
Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences | Fédération des sciences humaines
The Federation released a report in 2017 to support the ongoing conversation in Canada about the assessment of research impact in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS).
American Society For Cell Biology
The idea for the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment began at the 2012 ASCB Annual Meeting. As one of the initial DORA signatories, the ASCB does not promote its publications by the Journal Impact Factor.
Académie des Sciences, Leopoldina and Royal Society
Three national academies issued a statement on good practice in the evaluation of researchers and research programs in October of 2017. The statement recognized the need for efficient, fair, and robust researcher evaluation, especially as the size of the research community continues to increase.