Niels Mejlgaard and co-authors conducted a comprehensive study of research integrity in Europe, called “Standard…
Journal articles
The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship
In this article, Nicky Agate and co-authors use the work of the HuMetricsHSS Initiative to…
Rethinking success, integrity and culture in research (part 2) A multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science
The authors, Noémie Aubert Bonn and Wim Pinxten, conducted interviews and focus groups with a…
Rethinking success, integrity and culture in research (part 1) A multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science
The authors, Noémie Aubert Bonn and Wim Pinxten, conducted interviews and focus groups with a…
Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers’ opinions on success indicators
A survey was conducted by Noémie Aubert Bonn and Wim Pinxten to understand how Flemish…
Responsible Science Assessment: downplaying indexes, boosting quality
In this piece, Alicia Kowaltowski, Ariel Silber, and Marcus Oliveira outline challenges faced by the…
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities
To improve research assessment practices in academic institutions, it is critical to understand the institutional…
Rethinking Research Assessment for the Greater Good
The ScholCommLab in Canada conducted a multi-year project examining more than 850 review, promotion, and…
The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics
The Leiden Manifesto provides ten principles for the appropriate use of metrics in research evaluation.
The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity
Institutions and funders can use the Hong Kong Principles to reward and recognize scholars for behavior that contributes to trustworthy research.