An undated guide from University of Surrey on use of metrics. It notes the university formed a repsonsible metrics working group in 2021 which created an implementation plan the same year, and signed DORA in 2022.
Principles
Statement of principles for the use of metrics in evaluating Nottingham Trent University’s research
A 2019 statement from Nottingham Trent University on use of metrics in research assessment. Ten prinsiples are outlines, such as use of qualitative evidence, allowing those evaluates to check the data used, and taking field practices into account.
VU Vision on Recognition & Rewards
A 2021 document from Vrije Univeriteit Amsterdam that outlines the institutions goals on research recognition. It ermphasizes quality, balance, leadership, and open science.
Queen Mary signs international declaration to improve research evaluation
A 2020 statement from Queen Mary University of London about signing DORA and how it forms part of the university’s commitment to regularly review assessment.
Research Assessment
An undated set of guidelines from ETH Zurich on how to assess research. It describes signing DORA and how it implemented its principles, notably by requiring qualitative criteria.
King’s College London’s commitment to fair and responsible research assessment
Statement from King’s College London outlining the university’s approach to responsible research assessment. It notes the institution signed DORA in 2017 and expected policies in 2021.
The use of Quantitative Indicators in Research Evaluation
A 2021 policy document from Teesside University on use of quantitative metrics. It notes the university signed DORA in 2017 and supports the Leiden Manifestor and the Metric Tide.
Edge Hill University statement on responsible metrics
A 2021 list of Edge Hill University assessment polcies that notes the university signed DORA in 2018 and follows the Leiden Manifesto.