Utrecht University: Recognition and Rewards Criteria

This vision document of Utrecht University outlines its institutional version of the Dutch national reform initiative ‘Recognition and Rewards’ introduced in 2019.

Staying with the Trouble: Designing a values-enacted academy

The College of Arts & Letters Dean’s office at Michigan State University set out plans to introduce holistic assessment criteria for recognizing and rewarding contributions by staff during their careers.

Frequently Asked Questions

This page contains frequently asked questions (FAQs) for faculty at University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus about their rights, responsibilities, benefits, faculty appointments, promotions, tenure and faculty development.

Academia in Motion: Recognition and Rewards at Leiden University

In 2020 Leiden University implemented a new initiative to revamp academic recognition and rewards. Academia in Motion: Recognition & Rewards describes Leiden University’s commitment to diversity, as well as their ambition for diversification of careers, transparency and leadership.

Case Study: University Medical Centre Utrecht

This case study discusses the new evaluation framework in place at University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, implemented in 2021. This change in evaluation procedure was motivated by UMC Utrecht’s commitment to assessing researchers based on their scientific and societal contributions, and whose criteria were discussed in a group called Science in Transition (SIT).

Qualification Portfolio UMC Utrecht

The University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht) Qualification Portfolio lists components for candidate professors or professors seeking promotion to include in a narrative.

Case Study: Ghent University

This case study by DORA describes the new conceptual framework for research assessment developed at Ghent University. The new model seeks to escape a competitive framing of researcher achievements, instead seeking to differentiate according to individual talents.