“A Practical Guide to Implementing Responsible Research Assessment at Research Funding Organizations” provides action-oriented guidance, resources, and illustrative examples, for research funding organizations (RFOs) who are looking to shape and deliver responsible research assessment (RRA) practices.
“Implementing Responsible Research Assessment at RFOs: Quick-Reference Sheets from the Practical Guide” is a set…
“Implementing Responsible Research Assessment at RFOs: Informational Briefs from the Practical Guide” is a set…
This guide, “Writing and Evaluating Narrative CVs,” is the one of three resources from the Breaking…
This concept map, “Barriers and Facilitators to Adopting Narrative CVs by Underrepresented Researchers,” is one of…
This report, “Working Together for Effective Narrative CVs: Insights, Challenges, and Next Steps,” is one of three…
This is part of DORA’s toolkit of resources to support academic institutions that are improving…
This is part of DORA’s toolkit of resources to support academic institutions that are improving…
This document provides guidance on the use of several indicators (sometimes called metrics) used in research assessment: the Journal Impact Factor and other measurements of journals, citation counts, h-index, field-normalized citation indicators, and altmetrics. Five principles guide the use of these metrics: be clear, be transparent, be specific, be contextual, and be fair.
“A Practical Guide to Implementing Responsible Research Assessment at Research Performing Organizations” provides action-oriented guidance, resources, and illustrative examples, for research performing organizations (RPOs) who are looking to shape and deliver responsible research assessment (RRA) practices. This includes RPOs who are looking to create an RRA strategy, organizations wanting to reform existing practices, and organizations simply wanting to take steps towards more holistic and inclusive approaches to research assessment.