A 2019 statement from Nottingham Trent University on use of metrics in research assessment. Ten prinsiples are outlines, such as use of qualitative evidence, allowing those evaluates to check the data used, and taking field practices into account.
Responsible Metrics
VU Vision on Recognition & Rewards
A 2021 document from Vrije Univeriteit Amsterdam that outlines the institutions goals on research recognition. It ermphasizes quality, balance, leadership, and open science.
Queen Mary signs international declaration to improve research evaluation
A 2020 statement from Queen Mary University of London about signing DORA and how it forms part of the university’s commitment to regularly review assessment.
Action Plan 2020-2022
A 2020 plan from London South Bank University to develop career’s of researchers. The plans include seven principles spanning career points from recruitment to promotion and development.
Research Assessment
An undated set of guidelines from ETH Zurich on how to assess research. It describes signing DORA and how it implemented its principles, notably by requiring qualitative criteria.
Promoting Open Science
An interview with president of the Open Science Strategic Committee of EPFL that notes the institution signed DORA and on training to and practices to enhance open science.
King’s College London’s commitment to fair and responsible research assessment
Statement from King’s College London outlining the university’s approach to responsible research assessment. It notes the institution signed DORA in 2017 and expected policies in 2021.
The use of Quantitative Indicators in Research Evaluation
A 2021 policy document from Teesside University on use of quantitative metrics. It notes the university signed DORA in 2017 and supports the Leiden Manifestor and the Metric Tide.