This paper examines how to appropriately recognize and reward quality research. It critiques the overreliance on traditional quantitative indicators like journal impact factor and citation counts in evaluating scientific achievements. These metrics often fail to capture the true value and impact of research and can lead to undesirable behaviors that hinder scientific progress.
The authors advocate for a shift towards a more holistic assessment approach that prioritizes quality, transparency, reproducibility, and innovation. The proposed RESQUE (Research Quality Evaluation) framework includes specific evaluation criteria and a two-stage process combining metric indicators with qualitative assessment. An online tool supporting these assessments is introduced. The goal is to foster a research culture that values genuine contributions over sheer quantity, potentially transforming hiring, promotion, and funding practices across academia.
Gärtner, A, Leising, A, Schönbrodt, FD (2024). Towards responsible research assessment: How to reward research quality. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002553